Home > Blog posts > Augmentation vs. Managed Services: Which Model is Right for Your Business?
 2 minutes read

Augmentation vs. Managed Services: Which Model is Right for Your Business?

Junun Saleh
November 6th, 2024
Free Trial
Reliable employee tracking software
Clear visibility and insights into how employees work. Even remotely.

In today’s competitive business landscape, finding the right staffing model is crucial for companies aiming to optimize productivity, control costs, and gain a strategic edge. Staff augmentation and managed services are two popular outsourcing models, each offering distinct benefits and challenges. Choosing between these models depends on factors like the scope of the project, available resources, and the desired level of control. Below, we’ll explore what each model entails, the pros and cons, and real-life use cases to help determine the best fit for your organization.

What is Staff Augmentation?

Staff augmentation is an outsourcing model where companies add skilled professionals to their existing teams to fill skill gaps or address temporary needs. These staff members are typically employed by a third-party provider but work under the client’s management, following its processes, workflows, and culture.

Pros of Staff Augmentation

1
Flexibility in Staffing:
Companies can scale resources up or down based on demand, offering greater flexibility for project-specific needs.
2
Direct Control:
The augmented staff works directly under the client’s supervision, ensuring full control over processes and project direction.
3
Immediate Access to Skills:
Staff augmentation provides access to specialized skills that may be difficult to recruit for permanently, which is ideal for short-term or high-skill projects.
4
Cost-Effective for Short-Term Needs:
For projects lasting a few months, this model can save costs related to long-term hiring and benefits.

Cons of Staff Augmentation

1
Increased Management Responsibilities:
The client is responsible for managing the augmented staff, which can add to the internal team’s workload.
2
Potential Long-Term Costs:
If used for extended periods, staff augmentation can become more costly than hiring permanent employees.
3
Limited Knowledge Retention:
Temporary staff may leave after the project, taking valuable knowledge with them and creating potential knowledge gaps.
4
Potential for Misaligned Expectations:
Because these staff members are external, there may be differences in work culture and expectations that need to be managed.

Use Cases for Staff Augmentation

  • IT Projects:
A software development company might need extra developers with specific programming skills for a six-month app development project. Staff augmentation allows the company to bring on specialized talent without committing to long-term employment.
  • Seasonal Demand:
Retail companies may use staff augmentation during peak shopping seasons to meet temporary demand without hiring permanent staff.
Example:

A retail company needs a team of e-commerce developers to launch a new website for the holiday season. Using staff augmentation,
the company can hire temporary developers with the necessary expertise without committing to permanent hires.

What are Managed Services?

Managed services involve outsourcing the entire management and execution of a specific function or process to an external provider. The service provider is responsible for delivering agreed-upon results, allowing the client to focus on core business activities while the provider handles the outsourced function.

Pros of Managed Services

1
Reduced Operational Burden:
The provider handles management, allowing internal teams to focus on core business activities.
2
Predictable Costs:
Managed services often come with a fixed monthly or annual cost, making budgeting easier.
3
Access to Advanced Technology:
Service providers often use the latest technology and practices, giving clients access to advanced tools and resources.
4
Improved Efficiency and Scalability:
Managed services providers have expertise in their fields and can often perform tasks faster and more efficiently than internal teams.

Cons of Managed Services

1
Loss of Direct Control:
Clients may have less day-to-day control over processes, which can be an issue if business needs change.
2
Potential for Misalignment:
Managed service providers may operate differently from the client’s preferred workflow or culture, which can create challenges.
3
Dependency on Provider’s Reliability:
If the provider faces staffing or technology issues, the client’s operations can be impacted.
4
Contractual Commitments:
Managed services often require longer-term contracts, which may be a disadvantage if business needs shift.

Use Cases for Managed Services

  • IT Infrastructure Management:
 A company can outsource IT management, including network monitoring, cybersecurity, and data backup, to a managed service provider, freeing its internal team to focus on strategic initiatives.
  • Customer Support:
Managed services for customer support can provide businesses with 24/7 support, enhancing customer satisfaction without adding significant internal resources.
Example:

A healthcare company might outsource its IT infrastructure to a managed service provider to ensure data security and compliance without overburdening its in-house IT team.

Maximize productivity of your business

Track employee productivity and simplify work with them

Start Your 10-Day Trial

Comparing Staff Augmentation and Managed Services

Conclusion

Choosing between staff augmentation and managed services depends on your business goals, budget, and control preferences. If you need specific expertise and want to oversee the project directly, staff augmentation may be the better choice. For companies seeking streamlined operations and expertise without daily oversight, managed services are often a more efficient and cost-effective option. Many businesses find that a hybrid approach best meets their needs, using staff augmentation for specialized tasks and managed services for ongoing support. By understanding the benefits, drawbacks, and use cases for each, companies can make informed decisions that align with their strategic objectives.

– The Monitask Team

Frequently Asked Questions

When should a company choose staff augmentation over managed services?

Staff augmentation is ideal when companies need specific skills on a short-term basis or want full control over project management. It’s commonly used for project-based work or temporary needs.

What are the risks of managed services?

Managed services can limit the client’s control over processes and introduce dependencies on the provider’s reliability. Any disruptions in the provider’s operations may impact the client’s business continuity.

How do the costs of staff augmentation compare to managed services?

Staff augmentation costs are generally variable, depending on the duration and skill level of staff needed. Managed services typically have fixed costs, which make budgeting easier but can require longer commitments.

Can both models be used simultaneously?

Yes, companies can use both models together. For example, they may use staff augmentation for specialized, short-term projects while relying on managed services for ongoing, operational tasks like IT management.

Popular Articles

Try Monitask now.
First 10 days free

No credit card required